Warren Buffett's 10-year bet
posted 06/20/08 06:55 AM
|
Viewed 164 times
In the investment world, the debate over the merits of active vs. passive management styles just got a little more raucous. Taking the side of passive, buy-and-hold investors everywhere, Warren Buffett has made a gentlemanly wager with hedge fund firm Protege Partners that the firm couldn’t beat the S&P 500 over the next 10 years. After reading various media interpretations of the wager and comments from readers, the website All About Alpha has provided an extended analysis of the wager between Buffett and Protege Partners, weighing in on seven key points -- including the fact that Buffett may actually be more of an "active" manager than he would like to admit.
So what are Buffett’s odds of winning the wager? As All About Alpha suggests, they’re actually pretty good: "Over the past 18 years, the HFRI Fund of Funds index has basically kept pace with the S&P 500 (HFRI is after-fees, S&P 500 is total return but before any (minimal) passive management fees). The 10 year rolling annualized returns (using a geometric average) show that with reinvested dividends, the S&P 500 usually does a little better than the HFRI fund of funds index - although both are on their way down. The result is that the S&P 500 actually beat the HFRI on a 10-year basis in 86% of months since January 2000 (the first month when the HFI benchmark had a 10 year history). So if Protege logs average performance for a fund of funds and both benchmarks perform in a similar manner of the next 10 years as they have in the past 18, then Buffett may emerge the winner."
Although the outcome may not actually prove the merits of either side, it will certainly be interesting to track the performance of Protege over time. After all, there's serious money at stake -- both Buffett and Protege have each put up $320,000. [image: Warren Buffett]
|