pretzel > Blogs

User Avatar
Brokerage Account
5 Day -1.54%
15 Day 13.35%
1 Month 28.50%
3 Month 1.29%
6 Month -60.88%
As of: 01/08/09
How is this calculated?

Member since: Dec 07

is this legal/ethical/typical?

I work for a temp company at company "x"'s site.  I noticed recently that it looks like we'll be gaining a new client for our services, bank "B".  Upon perusing some financial sites, I noticed that Bank "B" upgraded company "x" a few months ago.

Is it right for Bank "B" to upgrade company "x" even though, I would assume, part of the reason for the upgrade is Bank "B" would be pouring some of their own money into it?

 

Cheers,

 

G

Share This! Report

Posted by pretzel on 06/25/08 at 02:46 PM

Tag It

Comments

User Avatar
User Avatar Brokerage Account

Will Profit

Member since: Mar 07

Trades Not Shared
Trade Notes 77
Blog Posts 116
retired
Age: 90's
UNITED STATES
Will Profit
The upgrade game is most simplistic when broken down to it's algebraic roots. "X"tra + "B"uddies=XB (meaningless) + 10% = B*** S*** 
User Avatar
User Avatar Brokerage Account

k-man

Member since: Nov 07

5 Day 16.24%
15 Day 27.90%
1 Month 16.14%
3 Month -1.52%
6 Month -60.52%
As of: 01/08/09
How is this calculated?
Trades 38
Trade Notes 34
Blog Posts 32
Systems Administrator
Age: 30's
Georgia
k-man

I don't know if institutional upgrades and investments by that same institution are related, but if some analyst working for that institution issues an upgrade, more than likely their client base will see that as good news and come with investment dollars in hand.  If the upgrade is public information (which is how you had found out about it), I'm sure other investors will put money into XYZ's stock.

One thing to watch for when working at publically traded companies is the procurement of inside information.  Just to be on the safe side, I would only make trade decisions based solely on what you find in the financial news.  Suppose you work for ABC and you are working on a deal to merge ABC and XYZ together and XYZ accepted the terms of the merger.  You can't use this information as a basis to buy XYZ because the merger information had not been announced publically.  Once ABC announces that they will merge with XYZ, then XYZ stock becomes fair game to you.

User Avatar
User Avatar Brokerage Account

corbinb2

Member since: Nov 07

5 Day 2.90%
15 Day 13.36%
1 Month -8.16%
3 Month -12.84%
6 Month -41.37%
As of: 01/08/09
How is this calculated?
Trades 76
Trade Notes 79
Blog Posts 60
Business Owner
Age: 40's
AZ UNITED STATES
corbinb2

The question here seems to be more about the ethical actions of the companies. Based strictly on your example and no other details, it would seem to be at least unethical and depending on the details behind it, possibly illegal. However, proving the exact sequence of events and who knew what and when is unlikely to generate any real results.

 

On the insider trading note the k-man made, you need to be careful that the only basis for the trade being executed is the publicly available knowledge. If it can be proved that your decision to trade the stock was based on an inside knowledge, you could be subject to legal action. Again proving it would be most likely difficult, but it is a possibilty.

The content and stock or option symbols on this page are for educational and informational purposes only and should not be considered a recommendation or solicitation to invest in a particular security or type of security. Your use of the TradeKing Community is conditioned to your acceptance of all TradeKing Disclosures and of the TradeKing Community Terms of Service. © 2009 TradeKing.
Testimonials may not be representative of the experience of other clients and are not indicative of future performance or success.
Quotes delayed at least 15 mins. Market Data provided by Interactive Data. Terms & Conditions. Powered and implemented by Interactive Data Managed Solutions.