volatility crunch: part 1
Here’s a scenario I hear a lot around earnings season, or in volatile sectors generally: you spot a cheap OTM option with a few weeks of life left on a relatively low-priced stock and decide, hey: maybe I could do something with the volatility on that. Sound familiar? Today I want to provide a little perspective on this thinking, so you can avoid what’s known in the industry as a volatility crunch.
If we’re looking for an especially volatile sector that’s tempting many investors right now, we don’t need to look much further than financial services. The sector is extremely volatile because of the sub-prime mortgage mess. Consider Washington Mutual or WAMU (Symbol WM) as an example. This stock is getting hit hard right now by the sub-prime and credit woes, and the February ATM option is trading at a 95% implied volatility. That’s compared to historical and implied volatility a year ago down around 11-12%. I’m not implying that any one should buy or sell this stock; but MU fits the description of a volatile stock that might lure you into a volatility crunch.
Say you’re interested in speculating on MU’s bottom. Now because of the increased implied volatility, you might be tempted to go further out of the money when buying long calls so the contracts are cheap enough to load up a bit on them. Let’s imagine that, with the stock at 14.20, we bought the February 17.50 strike contract with 32 days remaining to expiration. That contract costs us 50 cents – a real bargain, right?
Ask yourself: what PERCENTAGE gain are you asking the stock to make?
Let’s consider this from a new light. On a percentage basis, a 3.30 cent point move up a $14.20 stock is 23%. That’s a huge move in just 32 days, even for a volatile stock. In other words, that 17.50 call is cheap for a reason: because the probability of the stock hitting the strike price in the next month is pretty low.
Say the stock two weeks later bumps up 2 points on a news headline, a very respectable move in the right direction for your trade. Problem is, for some reason your options isn’t budging at all in response. If you got the move right, why aren’t you making any money? Simple: That 50-cent cheapo price reflected the very, very low probability that your stock would move up to 17.50 before expiration, and probability in this case proved correct: the stock is only now at 16.20, not 17.50. It would still take a 7% move to get to the strike and now there is only a few days remaining to expiration. After the news implied volatility in the options will tend to dissipate, especially if the market is more comfortable with the new stock price. (In the options market implied volatility tends to equate to fear.)
The news has passed, and with it the action in terms of volatility spikes. Its chances now of moving another 8% are close to nil – so unfortunately, you’ve just wasted 50 cents on that long-shot call that probably won’t stage any comebacks. That’s called getting caught in a volatility crunch.
Bottom line, for this scenario were to end happily for you, you need the stock to basically make the entire 23% move before expiration. Now with that said, it’s not impossible for a move like this to happen, and if it did, you’d look like a genius. Not impossible, but extremely unlikely. Why cross your fingers for a miracle when you can assess the odds before placing the trade? As you consider this move before making it, ask yourself: what you are asking the stock to do for you on a percentage basis? Does such a move seem likely to happen before expiration? If the answer is no then don’t buy that option; try something different. There’s plenty of money to be made in reasonable speculation – let those wing-and-a-prayer trades go.
Prices, IV, and probabilities: all in tandem
This brings me back to a topic I explored in this blog not too long ago: the tight interrelationship between options prices, implied volatility, and probabilities of success. (Check out the theory in my previous blog post.) Put simply, these three factors move in tandem, so one will never really get too far out of whack before bringing the other two factors back into relationship with it.
Here’s a metaphor that may help: think of options like an insurance policy on your house. How much would you pay for that coverage on your house in Florida, with a hurricane brewing in the distance? Probably quite a lot.
News or earnings on stocks can work like that hurricane: they represent uncertainty on the horizon that could damage your portfolio. That uncertainty can drive up options prices, as investors use options as hedges on existing positions or for more speculative plays. If uncertainty around a particular stock is really high, that’s going to translate into higher-than-normal IV levels and higher prices. When all the news is out, though, prices and volatility levels will tend to drop, since the uncertainty has passed and you’ve “weathered” the storm. Make sure your options can weather the storm, too.
Next week: how could you play this differently?
Next week’s post will suggest a few alternate plays that may prove more effective. We’ll also get into a critical question: if 23% (in our example above) was just too huge of a percentage move to expect, what number would’ve been more reasonable? The answer goes back to this interrelationship between prices, volatility and probability of success. Assessing the probability of your trade before you make it is a crucial step towards more consistent profit-making and less wild gun-slinging.
Until next week, then!
Regards,
Brian (OG)
[image: Cap’n Crunch by The G-Tastic 7 on flickr]
While implied volatility represents the consensus of the marketplace as to the future level of stock price volatility or probability of reaching a specific price point there is no guarantee that this forecast will be correct.
Any strategies discussed or securities mentioned, are strictly for illustrative and educational purposes only and are not to be construed as an endorsement, recommendation, or solicitation to buy or sell securities.
Edited by optionsguy at 09/03/11 at 07:08 AM


Comments
Follow commentsGreen Thumb posted January 18, 2008 (12:52PM)
Tipu Sultan posted January 19, 2008 (07:59AM)
optionsguy posted January 22, 2008 (03:54AM)
You are correct, the symbol for WaMu is WM not MU. Rookie mistake on my part. Great catch and thanks for letting me know.
Regards,
Brian (Og)
sheridel posted January 29, 2008 (03:21AM)
sheridel posted January 29, 2008 (03:21AM)
MachoBacho posted February 01, 2008 (04:16PM)
optionsguy posted February 03, 2008 (04:58PM)
Hello MachoBacho,
I am glad you enjoyed the post and thanks for commenting. This does not mean to always stay away from these stocks. There are many alternative trades you can do like spreading. Please read the next blog for more ideas on how to trade stocks with high implied volatilities.
Regards,
Brian (Og)
optionsguy posted February 05, 2008 (03:28PM)
The answer to your question about working and trading options is that it depends. Are you speculating on short term market movements and just buying calls and puts. That would be hard to do and not have access to a computer most of the day. Now if you want to sell covered calls on stocks that you own because you are looking to sell the stock, that is a simple option strategy to implement. Please check out the learning center on the TK site. There is a plethora of material, especially for beginning option trader.
Regards,
Brian (Og)
Viking posted February 06, 2008 (08:57AM)
I work full time as well but have the luxury of being at a computer all day. However, I still don't have any time during my work hours to make trades. Instead, I usually do my DD the night before and plan a price I am willing to pay the next day.
My question is, because of my circumstances should I be willing to pay closer to the ask price when using a limit order? One example, is WM. I opened a GTC $16March Put for the bid of 1.10 last night. I didn't expect WM to drop so soon, I figured a month was plenty of time to hit what I believe is a stable 16 for them.
I am still confident in a couple of options I have "missed the boat" on but not sure if I should accept a higher premium which could possibly limit my reward and increase my risk. So is it better to put in at the bid and hope for the best or suck it up and pay the ask? If it helps any, I trade a bit on speculation but more technical thru charts.
optionsguy posted February 15, 2008 (07:58AM)
Ahhh yes the ultimate question. Should I just pay the ask or try to get a bargain and split the bid/ask spread or better yet enter the buy limit on the bid. This is the most asked question I receive. It does depend a lot on how much you want the option. You mentioned Technical Analysis, so to lets say the doji star ran into a bullish kicker, then bounced of the moving average and landed on a Fibonacci number (just joking). If all these things happen and it makes you extremely bullish just buy the thing and don't mess around with buy limits on the bid. Now if you are not so positive of direction them maybe you can play around, but if you miss it I would not chase it, there will be other opportunities. Last and probably the most import point is the liquidity of the options. If there are many contracts that trade each day on the option there is a much better chance of getting a fill at the mid or on the bid for a buy order. If very low volume there is a very low chance of filling on the mid or bid.
Regards,
Brian (Og)
You must Log In to post to this blog.
Not a member? Register Now to …