Mr. BigDog Goes to Washington

bigdog posted on 03/31/10 at 10:48 AM



Now that healthcare reform has passed, seems like the next big legislative issue affecting the markets will be financial industry reform. This video article from The Wall Street Journal is a good summary of where that initiative's at now and what might be included in the bill sponsored by Christopher Dodd (D-CT).

I'm a fan of regulating those areas of financial services where regulation has been lax and demonstrably contributed to our recent financial woes. Mortgage brokers and their related markets particularly come to mind here, as do little-understood instruments like credit-default swaps that caused the wider economy so much pain of late. Clearly we need to work to ensure the conditions that led to the subprime bubble and almost toppled the whole economy don't recur. That's a top priority for everyone.

What I'm NOT for is the so-called Trader Tax, a per-transaction tax that might get tacked to every sale or purchase of stocks, options or futures. This tax isn't currently part of the Dodd bill, but it's recurred enough times in discussions that it's not impossible that the topic will re-emerge yet again.

As I explained in a recent post, we think it's a misguided tax for one reason: you can’t easily separate Wall Street from Main Street anymore. The proposed tax seeks to penalize “fat cat” Wall Street firms whose risky speculations jeopardized the larger U.S. economy, but chances are it'll simply get passed along to America's 20 million Main Street investors who are already struggling against myriad obstacles to meet their basic financial goals.

We feel so strongly about this matter, in fact, that I traveled to Washington D.C. with my colleague Rich Hagen to meet with our representatives and get our views heard. Together we visited the offices of Senator Christopher Dodd (D-CT), Senator Richard Burr (R-NC), Senator Kay Hagen (D-NC), Senator George LeMieux (R-FL) and Senator Bill Nelson (D-FL), as well as House Representative Ron Klein (D-FL). Rich snapped a photo of me (above) as we made the rounds.

In some cases we met with the officials themselves, in other cases we met with senior staffers, but in all cases we were impressed at the time and attention these folks gave to the impending legislation and the thoroughness of our discussions. It was invigorating to take an active stance in democracy and represent our business and our customers this way - a first-time experience for both Rich and me.

It's great to know we've made contact with our representatives and can take further action if this tax re-appears in the financial-reform discussions. Will keep you posted, for sure!

P.S. if you're bugged by the media partisanship that seems so rife these days, you'll enjoy this fun detail: without exception, all the Democrats we visited had MSNBC running in their offices, while all the Republicans were watching Fox News. . The one legislator we visited known to be a “moderate”, Senator Nelson, had CNN on the tube. You gotta wonder: what would happen if they all switched the channels for a day or two?


----------------------------------------------------
Learn new trading strategies from the Options Guy, or hone your skills at TradeKing All-Stars. You can also follow us on Twitter or fan us on Facebook.

TradeKing provides self-directed investors with discount brokerage services, and does not make recommendations or offer investment, financial, legal or tax advice.

(c) TradeKing, Member FINRA, ISE and SIPC. http://www.tradeking.com
Share this! Report

Posted by bigdog on 03/31/10 at 10:48 AM

Comments

Risk Capital Pursuit posted March 31, 2010 (12:03PM)

Thats awesome. We should all be so inclined to participate in the process at that level. Yes, they should all switch channels for a few days. They are just listening to what they want to hear.

infoisgreat3 posted March 31, 2010 (01:04PM)

My-my, switching channels? Could you be held responsible for any ensuing heart attacks?  Just asking?

El Dorado posted March 31, 2010 (10:17PM)

Nice picture BigDog, definitely one to hang in the office. 

incubus posted April 01, 2010 (12:06AM)

I completely agree with fin regs on "too big" investment banks, derivatives and conflicts of interests.
I also think the trader tax is ridiculously misguided, effectively taxing the victims of the "too bigs" actions.

I recently watched an interview on CNBC, Bartiromo attempted to tell Barney Frank that there's no way to define prop trading, Barney simply answered in one word - "volume".

Wall St needs to be regulated, and taxed, according to volume of individual traders or institutions.

My guess is the financial lobby is very hard at work trying to get regulations placed that appear to be an attack on the problem, but inevitably cost the little guy while further enabling more of the same from Wall St.

Much like the PDT rule was supposedly put in place to curb volatility, all the while HFT trading was breaking all time volatility records.



bigdog posted April 01, 2010 (05:27PM)

Thanks, everyone. It was satisfying to meet with lawmakers face to face and air our concerns. Even more gratifying was the reception we got on all sides: we definitely felt people were ready to sit down, understand the dynamics of our business and how those dynamics would shape how the trader-tax in theory would probably play out in practice.

As I said, we’re tracking this issue closely, along with the overall financial-services reform strategy. Will keep you guys posted with any interesting new developments!

You must Log In to post to this blog.

Not a member? Register Now to …

  • See what other traders are doing
  • Make your own trades public
  • Share your thoughts on a trade
  • Join or start a group
  • Connect with like-minded traders