bigdog > Blogs

Is your co. a bailout “get” or “get-not”?


For anyone worried about the U.S. government tinkering dangerously with the private sector, check out this Wall Street Journal article by Bob Davis and Jon Hilsenrath, “Federal Intervention Pits ‘Gets’ versus ‘Get-Nots’”. In it they describe the many ways the U.S. corporate landscape is shifting as government money floods the market.

As Davis and Hilsenrath put it, “The massive intervention has shifted the way companies do business in a host of ways -- not all of them intended by the government. Increasingly, companies big and small are competing on the basis of their ability to tap government money. A divide is opening between gets and get-nots.”

The article then describes how some farm-equipment firms jockeyed to buy thrifts (and therefore qualify for financial-services bailout bucks); how consumers purchasing guns on credit had those purchased underwritten in part by bailout funds; and how some smaller firms may get squeezed out by larger, federally-supported counterparts. Interestingly, it also discusses how some firms are parlaying their refusal of bailout money into a competitive advantage.

Have you heard any weird tales of how all this federal intervention has trickled down into ordinary business life?

----------------------------------------------------
Learn new trading strategies from the Options Guy, or hone your skills at TradeKing All-Stars. You can also follow us on Twitter.

TradeKing provides self-directed investors with discount brokerage services, and does not make recommendations or offer investment, financial, legal or tax advice.

(c) TradeKing, Member FINRA, ISE and SIPC. http://www.tradeking.com
Share This! Report

Posted by bigdog on 06/22/09 at 10:02 AM

Tag It | 1 user tagged it: TradeKing, Wall Street Journal, bailout, TARP, market

Comments

User Avatar
User Avatar Brokerage Account

TheMechanic

Member since: Feb 09

Trades 370
Trade Notes 0
Blog Posts 3
TheMechanic
How can you save for the future (or now), if you're stuck paying for the past? Maybe get the government to pay for it.

An example I know of:

Live in the South. Southerners like small banks. The reasons are not really related to safety, rather, Southerners like personal service, being known by name, and not needing to wait in line. Small banks fill the Southern taste for personal business much better than crowded large banks. So, here in town we have many small banks, some just one branch, and also one regional bank (BB&T).

BB&T is hated from the past because of perceived or actual predatory lending. I've got no idea if true, but they have a bad word-of-mouth reputation. BB&T got TARP money for under capitalization, and also got the advantages associated with not needing to mark-to-market their bad loans anymore.

Our small banks did not need TARP money since they didn't screw-up when lending. They also mark-to-market their bad loans as in the past.

BB&T went on a campaign to attract depositors, offering 3 or 4% money markets and CD's. They therefore attracted money away from the small banks. Now with much more in time deposits than before, BB&T has stated intention to repay TARP.

BB&T started raising fees and changed methods of accounting for individuals' accounts. Their favorite new practice is to put deposits and withdrawals in a holding pool. They then select what order to enter onto the books. This results in lots of overdraft fees. A person banking with them needs internet access because of this. In this way, one can insure a deposit is actually posted to the account before writing checks. Also, one must be careful about the date written on the check, because that is the date used, instead of the date presented to the bank.

Meanwhile, the small banks are suffering from lack or capital due to money flowing out of their banks towards BB&T. This has caused some to offer unusually high rates in response to the 'competition' from BB&T. We are of course hoping they will all make it through this unfair situation relatively unscathed.
User Avatar
User Avatar TradeKing Staff Member

bigdog

Member since: Dec 05

Trades Not Shared
Trade Notes 0
Blog Posts 626
Founder & CEO, TradeKing
Age: 40's
Boca Raton, FL UNITED STATES
bigdog
Talk about a cautionary tale, TheMechanic - sorry you went through such a rigamarole with BB&T. Will you be taking your money back to your former small bank?

Speaking as a small-company guy myself, I'd imagine they'd love to have your business back - and it's great to hear you're a fan of small-company service! Even as we've grown, we've worked hard to build those personal client relationships and never make you feel like just a number.
User Avatar
User Avatar Brokerage Account

TheMechanic

Member since: Feb 09

Trades 370
Trade Notes 0
Blog Posts 3
TheMechanic
I always stayed with small bank. Only have a business account with BB&T (self-employed tax accountant), but, perhaps not for much longer.