bigdog > Blogs

The Reserve Fund and “breaking the buck”

the-reserve-logo.jpgAs a follow-up to my posts on the financial sector crisis and TradeKing account protection, I wanted to keep you all informed about a new development that’s probably troubling a few of you: the Reserve Fund’s announcement that their Primary Fund money market has officially “broken the buck”.

What’s “breaking the buck”? Let’s begin at the beginning here: The Reserve Fund announced yesterday that they’ve placed an investor redemption freeze of up to 7 calendar days on one of its money market funds, the Primary Fund (RFIXX). The Primary Fund had a $785 million stake in Lehman corporate paper which is now valued at zero. That pulls the per-share value of the Primary Fund down to 97 cents. Usually a money market fund’s net asset value per share (NAV) holds steady at $1 – that’s why dropping to 97 cents is called “breaking the buck”. It’s a rare occurrence in the money-market industry and usually a sign of the fund’s distressed finances.

As you can imagine, this development is making investors nervous, whether they’re directly affected or not. Most investors consider their money-market accounts like cash. They expect full freedom to withdraw their funds whenever they want, and they don’t expect the NAV to drop below $1.

Here’s another way to think of this scenario: imagine trying to open your piggy bank and finding out that, not only are you barred from withdrawing the money for up to seven days, your $100 bundle of cash inside the bank has dwindled to $97. That’s probably not what you were expecting when you stashed the money there in the first place.

MarketWatch put out an excellent story explaining this development in greater detail.

Luckily, only a few TradeKing clients were affected by this – 7, to be exact. Seven clients got into the Primary Fund after requesting that we invest their sweep accounts in a higher-yielding money-market fund and then choosing The Reserve’s Primary Fund as an alternative to our default cash sweep. Those 7 folks received prospectuses from the Reserve outlining the risks. We’re now actively getting in touch with them to explain the situation and find out what, if any, moves they’d like to make under the circumstances.

Now might be a good time to explain our default sweep account options and protections. Here’s the deal in brief:

Clients who deposit less than $50,000 and don’t request sweep will have their deposit remain in cash. (Since most of our clients are active traders, their tendency is to keep relatively little cash uninvested. In fact, some clients have requested NOT to be set up for sweep because they find all the journaling back and forth bothersome.)  However, if you DO want your cash in sweep, you don’t need to meet any minimums – you just need to tell us, and we’ll sign you up.

Clients with more than $50k in cash are automatically enrolled in the sweep program with our clearing firm, Legent. That account is FDIC-insured up to $1 million in cash per client. FDIC stands for Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation; you may be familiar with the term from the banking world. (I’ll get into more detail about account protections in a moment.)

As an alternative to this FDIC-insured default sweep, some clients choose to park their cash in a money market fund; usually they’re seeking a little higher yield. We offer a money market fund that invests only in U.S. Treasuries, and we’ve previously offered the Reserve’s Primary Fund.

That’s how sweep works at TradeKing in a nutshell. Now let’s review the account protections side of things:

As a SIPC Member firm, TradeKing client accounts are protected up to $500,000, of which $100,000 may be in cash. (If you’re one of our clients who’s opted out of sweep or hasn’t requested it, your cash is covered in that $100,000.) A money market is considered a security, not cash, so it's included in the $500K above.

As I mentioned above, cash in Legent’s sweep fund is insured by the FDIC for up to $1 million. That protection is above and beyond the SIPC coverage (described above) and the excess SIPC coverage (see below).

TradeKing also has excess SIPC insurance secured through Lloyd’s of London, providing clients an additional $24.5 million of protection above and beyond the SIPC coverage amounts (for a total account protection level of $25 million), of which $900,000 may be in cash (again, that excludes money market funds).

The coverage applies to brokerage firm failure and any theft or misappropriation of customer funds and securities associated with that failure.

Whew, that was a mouthful! But I thought this was a good chance to lay out how all this works in detail.

Keep those questions coming, folks. We understand that these are stressful, uncertain times, and we’re more than happy to help you sort things out.


    
[image: The Reserve logo from their website]

----------------------------------------------------
Follow the markets at the TradeKing Blog, learn options strategies from the Options Guy, or check out expert commentary on real client trades at TK All-Stars.

Add to del.icio.us Digg on Digg.com Submit to reddit.com
Bookmark It!

Edited by bigdog at 09/17/08 05:19 PM
User Avatar
User Avatar Brokerage Account

Running_with_scissors

Member since: Nov 06

5 Day 8.64%
15 Day -15.08%
1 Month -36.84%
3 Month -53.21%
6 Month -58.68%
As of: 12/02/08
Trades 213
Trade Notes 4
Blog Posts 8

Running_with_scissors

After reading that the money market sweep account in my 401K holds Fannie Mae and Fannie Mac debt I was concerned.  When I read in the financial times that a money market fund broke the buck, I thought there was more downside risk than interest.  I moved 100% to a short mutual fund.  I was supprised I came to the conclusion that being short is safer than a money market.  If they want me in mortgage backed securities or stocks, and don't allow holding cash, I picked the least threat.

My thinking is that the financial industry has shepharded 401K participants into positions they want us in.  It is time not to be a sheep.

User Avatar
User Avatar TradeKing Staff Member

bigdog

Member since: Dec 05

Trades Not Shared
Trade Notes 0
Blog Posts 443
Founder & CEO, TradeKing
Age: 40's
Boca Raton, FL UNITED STATES
bigdog

Sounds like you had an eventful day yesterday too, RwS. I came across another article this morning in the NY Times that's a good companion read to this post: http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/18/business/yourmoney/18money.html?_r=1&hp&oref=slogin. It may give you some ideas about where and how to park your cash safely.

It's important to remember how rare it is for a mutual fund to break the buck - according to Marketwatch, "This is only the second time that a money market fund's net asset value has dipped below $1. In 1994, Denver-based Community Bankers U.S. Government Money Market Fund returned 96 cents on the dollar to investors when bad derivatives investments forced it to liquidate." So, while it's definitely not good news for The Reserve and their shareholders, it doesn't necessarily signal a general outbreak of instability among money market funds. Then again, this market is making fools out of anyone who dares a prediction...I'm knocking on wood even as I type this!

User Avatar
User Avatar Brokerage Account

Running_with_scissors

Member since: Nov 06

5 Day 8.64%
15 Day -15.08%
1 Month -36.84%
3 Month -53.21%
6 Month -58.68%
As of: 12/02/08
Trades 213
Trade Notes 4
Blog Posts 8

Running_with_scissors

Yesterday turned out to be very profitable for me.

It is rare, and thus could be a 'black swan', for a bunch of money markets to break a buck.  The circular logic of debt fueled asset appreciation justifying more debt is now failing.  It has lead to insolvency crisis. 

When JP Morgan sends me information their money market (which they choose and don't allow me to changed in my 401K) is holding mortgage backed securities but doesn't say how much, I can't even assess my risk.  It was pretty freaky to think of money markets as 'safe as houses'.  This is what has changed, 'safe as houses' no longer rings true.

There was no way for me to assess if companies were moving toxic MBS/CMOs (yea thats how it was listed in my fund) off their books into money market and 'stable value' funds.  Sure I may be letting my immagination take me away. 

I just don't want to be booted out of my job without my savings like Lehman employees.

 

User Avatar
User Avatar TradeKing Staff Member

bigdog

Member since: Dec 05

Trades Not Shared
Trade Notes 0
Blog Posts 443
Founder & CEO, TradeKing
Age: 40's
Boca Raton, FL UNITED STATES
bigdog
Glad to hear it worked out well for you, RwS. You're absolutely right: "safe as houses" has a distinctly ironic ring to it nowadays...
The content and stock or option symbols on this page are for educational and informational purposes only and should not be considered a recommendation or solicitation to invest in a particular security or type of security. Your use of the TradeKing Community is conditioned to your acceptance of all TradeKing Disclosures and of the TradeKing Community Terms of Service. © 2008 TradeKing.
Testimonials may not be representative of the experience of other clients and are not indicative of future performance or success.