OldFart said: income, sorry I will have to disagree. Maybe I can use some charting education (always a good idea) but can you point me to some study that examines the head and shoulder pattern, espesially on indexes and when it has been successful and some stats
Charts, patterns and indicators as well as volume are nothing more the graphical representations of the mathmatics behind a stock or index.
Income points out a common pattern of reducing volume combined with the head and shoulders pattern where the market has topped and come back down and then started back to the level it was at on the high prior to the top., which often is a symptom of buyer exhaustion, a hesitation for buyers to continue assuming the market is going up0ward.
It means the market is sitting on a see-saw of sorts, waiting for the other side of the see-saw to either get lighter or heavier by even a slight amount to trigger the overall concensus on whether we go up or down from here.
Ask me just six months ago, and I'd have said it was voo-doo, but in the end math doesn't lie....these "tea leaves" aren't just pretty colors and fancy patterns, they actuallt represent something, but nothing to bet the farm on alone.
My point to income is that the market is constituted of two major parties..."us" and "them", individual traders/investors and institutional traders/investors like hedge funds and mutual funds.
I have a jaded view of the big guys, this past fall I was ripped to shreds by head fake after head fake on fantastic stocks that would report excellent earnings and then get plundered worse than the market around them.
To me, this meant they''d been intentionally targetted by hedge funds to make the most bang for their buck as they liquidated and deleveraged, which is why I made the point to Income I made above.
In knowing that a massive institution like GS has computer prgrams that actively trade and billions of dollars in resources at their avail, I'm just careful when placing bets that I suspect the average "home gamer" might be placing.
I am not disagreeing with Income, he's been at this most of his adult life, I'm only tossing a contrarian suspicion into the mix to see his thoughts.