Japan?

Posted by incubus on March 23, 2011 (08:58PM)

OldFart said: Sorry - looks like I missed this thread. I was a physicist (not nuclear) in my previous life. "Meltdown" if an overloaded word - it can mean many things and as they say the devil is in the details. Anyhow here is good explanation a few days old. Now the situation is more stable with electricity and cooling to the damaged reactors and spent fuel rods restored. Link - http://www.plainenglishnuclear.net/2011/03/yet-another-japan-reactor-post/

 Perfect - 

"3. Even if the reactor has a meltdown?  The media keeps saying we’re headed for a meltdown.  Isn’t that a very very bad thing?
Not necessarily.  “Meltdown” is a very broad term – it applies to a range of conditions.  “Meltdown” is basically any time that the fuel gets hot enough that the cladding (the metal wrapper that holds the fuel in place) gets holes in it.  But “meltdown” could mean just one teeny spot on one single fuel pin (the cladding starts to fail at about 2200 degrees F) all the way up to the entire reactor core in a liquid pool on the bottom of the pressure vessel (the fuel itself melts at about 5000 degrees F).  The media seems to think it’s that whole-core thing.  But that isn’t going to happen."

Though the question still stands on how they're going to be able to continue cooling rods that have reached temperatures exceeding the melting point of malleable metals.

MontanaTrader said: Inky, there is no way to get liquid nitrogen close enough to the reaction to cool it.  The nitrogen or whatever would evaporate, or explode if cooled to quickly.  Meaning you can't get nitrogen any where near close enough to the rods to cool the reaction.  The nitrogen would just keep evaporating never getting close to the rods. 

Note: Eighteen grams of water, a very small amount, pure water expands to 22.4 liters (gas law" mole of any gas is equiv. to 22.4 liters.)  So expansion of the cooling material is a big factor.  The cooling material evaporates well before it comes close enough to cool a reaction of this nature.  Eventually, I believe the reactors will be covered in concrete or some other material like the end result in Russia.

The rods are so hot, they cannot be pick up and separated either.  Quite the dilemma, is a core melt down.  Every noted scientist in the world is working on this Japan core melt down with no solutions at this time.

Montana

 At 212 degree's water turns to steam, which is 1680 times it's original mass.

I have seen water come in contact with liquid lead, in small amounts the water dances on the surface and does relatively little to cool the lead.

In larger amounts, the water will cause a steam explosion that ejects the melted metal.

Though OF's article does well to state the situation in Japan is under control, I still can't see how water alone will suffice to stem further heat increases when ione reactor is already at 900 F. 

I'm not stating they haven't figured it out, but asking what it is their doing.

Posted by incubus on March 24, 2011 (11:00PM)

Bad news, It's just been upgraded to level 6.

Level 6 puts Fukushima in second place only to Chernobyl.

An item of concern is the sea water that's been used to cool the rods, as the super hot rods immediately evaporate the sea water, the salt dries to the rods which then serves to insulate them from direct contact with more water and inhibits cooling.

If the heated rods get out of control, this illustrates my concern over the ineffectiveness to cool them at all where a point is reached that water is converted to Browns gas on contact, hydrogen and oxygen in a superheated environment equate to instant combustion..

With all four reactors within walking distance of each other, once one reactor reaches full core meltdown, it's possible the other three will have to be evacuated, not to mention the spent rods in storage in the vicinity that also need to be cooled.

Like I said, bad news.

Posted by gapup on March 25, 2011 (09:36AM)

ATAAF....Iodine miner.

Posted by incubus on April 11, 2011 (06:49PM)

...and now, as bad as it gets, upgraded to level 7.

Radiation readings now officially exceed Chernobyl.

Posted by Coolbeans on April 12, 2011 (04:55PM)

Decommissioning a nuclear plant and turning it back to public land is a large task. In the USA we have 13 plants that are in stages of shutdown and decontamination. The link below provides good information on the sites and status.

http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/fact-sheets/decommissioning.html

Posted by incubus on April 12, 2011 (05:12PM)

I think Fukishiima falls well outside a standard controlled decommission.

It's complicated by the fact that the only way they have to cool them from further meltdown is by flushing water into the cores.

In the case of one of the reactors with a cracked core, it's flushing into the open sea.

Given that so many species migrate globally, like sharks, or birds that might eat contaminated fish for instance, there's no way to know how this will effect global food chains.
  

Posted by spshapiro on April 12, 2011 (05:58PM)

Cool, please give me one instance of a site where a nuclear power plant once operated that is now used by anyone for anything outside of the nuclear industry.  While you are at it, could you tell me how many generations into the future is the time when you might feel comfortable having your great, great.....granddaughter live on that site.  Decommissioning is a joke, if one means reuse of the site.
I suspect that there will be an area of cheap land  north of Tokyo for quite some time.

Posted by incubus on April 12, 2011 (07:00PM)

Shap, Interesting segue, a few days ago the Swedish Skeptics society affirmed the Rossi cold fusion experiment is real by replicating a smaller operating version.

If this is real, (and I'm, still not saying it is) nickel is the new oil, uranium and copper prices will plummet, and OPEC might want to take a look into more Dubai type investments for the middle east.



Posted by Coolbeans on April 12, 2011 (08:44PM)


Spshapiro,

I posted the link that supports your earlier post that to date no site in the USA has been returned to the public. I live about 20 minutes from one of these sites currently undergoing decomissioning. If they get it done I would buy property there. Radiation is not something you can hide very well.

Incubus,

I agree this will be a first of a kind effort to resolve the Fukishiima problems in Japan. I heard a team (MT FUJI) is assembled from the best of all available groups to come up with the plan.

I am amazed at how well Mother Nature adapts to much of the crap we throw at her. Hope she can step up and adapt to this one for everyones benefit.   

You must Log In to post to this forum.

Not a member? Register Now to …

  • See what other traders are doing
  • Make your own trades public
  • Share your thoughts on a trade
  • Join or start a group
  • Connect with like-minded traders